From squirrel@echelon.alias.net Wed Mar 17 18:10:10 1999
Path: newscene.newscene.com!novia!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!peerfeed.ncal.verio.net!news.he.net!news.lava.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Date: 18 Mar 1999 01:10:10 -0000
Subject: FZ BIBLE 30/35 SOLUTION TO ENTRAPMENT 9TH ACC
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology
From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to
	<squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity
	is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
Message-ID: <f01bca965622b34d4bb88dd76f41619c@anonymous.poster>
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Lines: 1037
Xref: newscene.newscene.com alt.religion.scientology:690398 alt.clearing.technology:76260

FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

9th ACC - THE SOLUTION TO ENTRAPMENT CASSETTES 30/35

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But the Christians are not good and obedient Jews and yet
are allowed to have their old testament regardless of any
Jewish opinion.

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************


9TH ACC CONTENTS

December 1954 to January 1955 in Phoenix, Arizona.

Based on the solution to entrappment cassette version.

F# = File number (** = not available)
O# = Original Number (according to the master list posted by Pilot)
REN = As renumbered in the Solution to Entrappment cassettes

F# O#  REN  DATE  TITLE

01  1   1  Dec  6 Introduction to 9th ACC: Havingness
02  2   2  Dec  7 The Essence of Auditing, Know to Mystery Scale
03  3   3  Dec  8 Rundown on Six Basics
04  4   4  Dec  9 Communication Formula
05  5   5  Dec 10 The Practice of Dianetics and Scientology
06  6   6  Dec 13 Conduct of the Auditor
07  7   7  Dec 14 Mechanics of Communication
08  8   8  Dec 15 Havingness
09  9   9  Dec 16 Pan-determinism and One-way Flows
10  9A 10  Dec 17 Hist. & Dev. of Processes: Games & Limitations in Games
11  9B 10A Dec 17 History and Development of Processes: Q&A Period
12 10  11  Dec 20 Games (Fighting)
13 11  12  Dec 21 Anatomy of Games -- Part I
14 11A 12A Dec 21 Anatomy of Games -- Part II
15 12  13  Dec 22 One-way Flows in Processing
16 12A 13A Dec 22 One-way Flows in Processing: Question and Answer Period
17 13  14  Dec 23 Havingness and Communication Formulas
** 13A --  Dec 23 After Lecture Comments   
18 14  15  Dec 24 Pan-determinism
19 14A 15A Dec 24 Pan-determinism: Question and Answer Period
20 15  16  Dec 27 Training New People
** 15A --  Dec 27 Curiosa from Dianetics 55!
21 16  17  Jan  3 Auditing Requirements, Differences
22 16A 18  Jan  4 Time
** 16AA -  Jan  4 Q&A Period
23 17  19  Jan  5 Auditing at Optimum
24 18  20  Jan  6 Exteriorization
25 19  21  Jan  7 Elementary Material: Know to Mystery Scale
26 20  22  Jan 10 Education: Goals in Society -- Adult Education
27 21  23  Jan 11 Fundamentals of Auditing
** 21A --  Jan 11 Auditors' Conference
28 22  24  Jan 12 Definitions: Glossary of Terms -- Part I
29 23  25  Jan 13 Definitions: Glossary of Terms -- Part II
30 24  26  Jan 14 Definitions: Glossary of Terms -- Part III
31 25  27  Jan 17 Auditing Demonstration: Six Basics in Action
** 25A --  Jan 17 Auditors' Conference
32 26  28  Jan 18 Auditing Demonstration: Spotting Spots
** 26A --  Jan 18 Auditors' Conference
33 27  29  Jan 19 Auditing Demonstration: Exteriorization
34 28  30  Jan 20 Background Music to Living
35 29  31  Jan 21 Axioms: Laws of Consideration -- What an Axiom Is

Note that 6 of the 9 discussion periods (Q&A periods, Auditors'
Conferences, etc.) were omitted from the cassettes, leaving us
with only 35 files instead of the 41 that were recorded.  It is
also possible that material was edited out of the lectures which
are available.  If anyone has a set of the original reels, please
post any missing material.

========================

9ACC file 30/35

9th ACC 24 (26) - DEFINITIONS: GLOSSARY OF TERMS - PART III

Transcript of Lecture by L. Ron hubbard 9ACC24    -   
5501C14 Renumbered 26 for "The Solution To Entrapment"
cassettes

DEFINITIONS: GLOSSARY OF TERMS - PART III

A lecture given on l4 January 1955


Okay. Completely aside from all the balderdash we have been
going over, let's get it down to something interesting and
provocative. And let's start with a perfect duplicate. And
if youse guys don't understand the perfect duplicate,
you're going to wake up some day without a mock-up because
somebody made a perfect duplicate of you, and you're going
to consider this a big mystery.

A perfect duplicate is a duplicate made in the place of; in
the time of; with the energy of; surrounded by the space of
the onginal, which tells you all it is, is a consideration
that there are now two there.

And it's a funny thing about this universe: if you consider
that two things are occupying the same space, made out of
the same space, same energy, same time, in the same place,
all you had to do is consider that and it'll disappear. And
if you could consider that perfectly and not think of the
word hippopotamus while you did it, why, Earth and
everything else would start going by the boards.

Every once in a while you get somebody who is oriented in
the direction, in Dianetics, in the direction of erasure.
Erasure was not making things disappear; erasure was
taking the sense or significance out of the mass, and you
then at least had the mass. And so we could get away with
running engrams. But if you start making perfect duplicates
out of engrams, you lose the sense, significance and mass.

Now, it's an interesting thing that you don't necessarily
need to make a perfect duplicate of the significance to
make the thing disappear. That simply turns up and blows.
You don't have to know what the significance of something
is in order to make a perfect duplicate of it. Many people
hang up on that fact. It's totally a mechanical thing.

Now, this perfect duplicate, led to - discovery of; led to
a great deal of advancement in theory. It became very
obvious what an ultimate truth was. The rationale of this,
you will discover, in The Creation of Hu man Ability and in
The Auditor's Handbook, first copy; very little of it
there, it's in The Creation of Human Ability.

And this rationale is simply on this basis: A thetan is
attempting to make things duplicate him. And if he thinks
he's a mass, then he'll try to make things into a mass; and
if he thinks of himself as a static, then he'll try to make
things into a static. And the technique he's been looking
for is perfect duplication. He could make everything
duplicate him if he did this.

Now, his search for an ultimate truth is simply this: an
ultimate duplicate. And the ultimate duplicate of a thetan
would be a static, and that's all there is to it.

The great oddity, the great oddity of the perfect duplicate
is that it apparently leads to one of the finest processes
you ever heard of An engram turns up, you run the guy back
into birth, you say, "Make a peffect duplicate of it." He
does, and he makes a running-fire duplicate, you know - so
that he's taking each motional moment of birth, you see,
and he just makes a running-fire duplicate - and bang! Birth
is gone. So is its energy gone; so is its ma - everything.
It's all gone. Nicest thing you ever saw in your life. He
gets sick as hell. Taken all his mass away from him. The
only reason he's holding onto the engram is the mass. I
say the only reason; there is a significance reason.

So the perfect duplicate was quite a discovery. And when I
fell into that one, I felt I had either gone up a long way
or fallen a long way.

Now, if you were to make your remote viewpoints over here -
set up a remote viewpoint opposite every particle of energy
in that wall over there, and then have the remote viewpoint
make a perfect duplicate of the particle at the point of
its origin, the wall would disappear. It really does
disappear. Little chunks of it can be made to disappear
like this with somebody. It's very curious, very curious.
If thetans are trying to make nothing out of something all
the time, why, there's their chance.

Okay. Now, let's take up this word - by the way, the perfect
definition, what is a perfect duplicate? It is a duplicate
made in the same location with the same energy as the
original. Just say it's made with the same MEST as the
original, and that is the correct answer. It's a perfect
duplicate, not a thing wrong with it, except that
everything, then, disappears. This word dynamic is
something you better not have omitted. Dynamic was chosen
to represent an energetic urge or thrust and the word
dynamic itself was an urge, a thrust, a motion toward
survival. And for our purposes, we could really call it an
energetic effort to survive. Get that?

Dynamic has little more than consideration connected with
it. It's not just a consideration, you see, although
you - basically, everything is a consideration. A dynamic is
actually an energetic urge in a certain direction. Working
things with stuff; and so forth, in order to get someplace
in the direction of survival.

And you know the dynamics: self; sex, group, man, life,
MEST, spirits and infinity. Proper answer for the eighth is
infinity, not the supreme being. But you could write it
supreme being if you wanted to, but don't lose track of it
yourself. It doesn't mean supreme being. We don't know if
there is one, unless it's you and me, and him over there.
And all of us together got into a disagreement and decided
we'd better agree on something, so we did, and we got a
universe. Although there's some curiosa in this line which
is fabulous. There's apparently something which takes all
the responsibility there is for making men and something
that takes all the responsibility there is for making
women. We call these things the spirit of man, the spirit
of woman. There's also the spirit of dogs, the spirit of
trees, the spirit of grass, the spirit of cows, and so on.
If we start granting beinguess to this particular spirit,
we get ourselves into some interesting situations.

You go and start fooling around with an ant who is crawling
along, he's crawling along the ground, he's minding his own
business, he's not bothering you, he's not processing
anybody or throwing around any entheta, he isn't publishing
Dianotes or Aberree; he's not doing anything, you
understand, I mean, he's minding his own business. Nothing
he could be killed for. And we're exteriorized, see, and we
just push him a little bit, push him off course. He'll come
back onto course again. Push him off course. He'll come
back onto course again. And we'll really shove him off
course and make him - if you do it about one more time, he'll
start to run in circles. He'll, you know, get dizzy, upset;
his course and direction is very much disturbed. And then
about this time, you will feel there is something very
angry somewhere. You'll just have that feeling that there's
something upset.

[Ed notes: The glossary included with the cassette tapes
defined "Aberree: the title of a publication that gave false
and slanderous statements about Scientology" and "Dianotes:
A squirrel publication (one which gives offbeat or altered
Dianetics or Scientology technology) issued around the time
of this lecture"]

Now, it is not the thetan running the ant, if we consider
that the ant has a thetan who is interiorized or in his
vicinity, and so on. It's something much bigger and much
more powerful, and at this moment you have contacted the
spirit of at least that breed of ants. And you keep on
fooling with this ant, and this spirit just gets madder and
madder and madder and madder and then skips it. Nothing
happens.

You talk about the amount of threat which is levied,
however; it's terrific. And I have discovered this and
have learned not to worry about it every time I have
disturbed any particular type of life form. For instance,
I've made some experiments on jack rabbits. Tried to find
out what jack rabbits were thinking about. Boy, are they
aberrated. And jack rabbits - jack rabbit sees a coyote over
here in back of a bush one day and thereafter every bush of
that type has a coyote behind it. And of course, the jack
rabbit can't investigate this because he hasn't the
strength to enforce his investigation, so he has to
consider then that every bush of that type has a coyote
behind it. And he goes along one day and he sees a wolf;
and the wolf is sitting behind a rock. And the jack rabbit
notices this and escapes, and then he has to consider that
every rock of that color has a wolf behind it. And do you
know that they're so daffy that the size of the rock has
nothing to do with it thereafter. A great big rock has a
wolf behind it or a little rock has a wolf behind it, a
little tiny pebble, if it's all the same color, each one
has a wolf behind it.

And he has to walk in the most superstitious courses you
ever ran into. And he is so superstitious! He believes, he
believes that the moon, when it's half tipped over in a
certain particular direction, and so forth, means he's
going to get et before the night is out. He also dances by
the moon and he has tribal rites and so on. But he's nuts,
see. Perfectly nuts.

You talk about identification. Man, a jack rabbit's sure
got it. When he gets scared about something, even though to
thee or me it'd be a very light lock indeed, it is a
permanent trauma with a jack rabbit to be handed down
through all remaining generations of jack rabbits. Oh, it's
fabulous.

Coyotes, coyotes are 1.1, but in f - very definitely 1.1.
And wolves are "only one," even when they run in a pack,
they're an "only one" sort of a nature.

Each one of these things has its own definite
characteristics. But every one of them has in common this
factor, that you start fooling around with the anchor
points of a jack rabbit and steer him off course and steer
him off course and steer him off course or short out his
brain or something of this sort, so he'll go appetite over
tin cup at a high run. It's very amazing to a jack rabbit
to all of a sudden have all of the neurons controlling his
running, short, you know, and his commands are not going
through, nothing is continuing in any direction. He'll go
appetite over tin cup. But you do something like that and
something gets awful mad. Something way off there
someplace, you know? And it gets madder and madder and
madder and madder and gives it up.

Now conversely, I took a guy one time that'd just eaten
some poisoned fish, and knowing this weird fact, I then
started to process the spirit of this particular type of
fish, had this guy grant it beingness. And it got madder
and madder and he got sicker and sicker and all of a sudden
he was perfectly well. Get the idea?

There's evidently something which makes a whole lot of GEs
of one kind, and possibly a something for every kind of
these GEs. And this thing does demand propitiation and if
you were good and weak-minded, you'd go ahead and
propitiate. The right course is to make the jack rabbit
keep on tumbling because it won't do anything to you. But
it could enforce its wrath upon somebody who would eat one
of its mock-ups by having the mock-up be very poisonous.
It has very definite laws by which it does this. Curiosa,
just curiosa.

I've had - by the way, we have several homosexuals and
lesbians who have been very well fixed up by granting
beingness to the spirit of man and the spirit of woman. A
girl, for instance, who is definitely on the boy side of
the register straightened out her case simply by having her
grant beingness to the spirit of woman, grant beingness to
the spirit of woman. All sorts of locks and things fly off;
but the fact of the matter is the body reverts to a
feminine characteristic. So, maybe it isn't just curiosa.
Maybe it's worth knowing.

We straightened out two of the worst ones you ever wanted
to see here, just a very short time ago. The auditor got a
happy inspiration all of a sudden and said, "Well, just
grant some beingness to the spirit of woman. Oh, the person
just couldn't do this, so we had to grant some beingness on
a gradient scale. It was grant beingness was in this wise:
Permit it to exist. "What of a woman's paraphernalia could
you be - would you permit to continue in existence?"

"Fhhhh. Oh, um - " Finally, "A park bench that a woman
had - which an old bum was asleep on at the moment, but which
a woman had sat on two or three years ago." Yet way afield,
got her started in that direction, then worked it right on
up to where the person could grant beingness to the spirit
of woman. And all of a sudden a physiological change took
place which was quite marked.

No wonder rabbits get superstitious. I get superstitious
myself when I start looking over some of this stuff. The
very little phenomena like that lying around. There are
storm god phenomena and there's the God of Storms over in
India that the boys go over and talk to every once in a
while. There's the God of the Typhoon who lives down off
the coast of Africa. The typhoons that sweep on up into the
Caribbean are generated down there. And he doesn't know why
he does this, there isn't any reason, but it's a good game.
And there are other thetans of this magnitude around who
sooner or later will be inside somebody's head.

All right. Here we have effort. Effort has the same
definition it has always had in physics, which is force
with direction. A physical effort in the MEST universe;
force with direction. Force does not have direction. When
you call it effort, it does have direction. You see that?

All right. Then some things dropping from somewhere at
random and going off in various directions could still be a
force. But when we give those a direction and when we say
the force is applied in a certain direction, we use the
word effort. Now, there's Effort Processing which has been
long gone and so on. But Effort Processing was a fantastic
thing in that it showed that the body was a composite of
efforts and counter-efforts, and you could see an engram in
its formation making up for some future form.

So that this whole principle of making a facsimile would be
the principle of an effort. And when an individual has an
effort to resist something or keep something from going
away, he makes some honeys. That's one thing you really
should know about an effort; they just make some lulus. You
know that if this individual's got some pressure on his
nose that he's objecting to, and you started to process it
with Communication Processing, the next thing you know it
would be a little bit deeper into the nose and then it'd be
a little bit deeper and then it'd probably hit his mouth,
and then it'd probably be back about the level of his ear
at which moment he'd be feeling apathetic. Got the idea? In
other words, he's resisting this incoming effort. It's his
resistance, his continued resistance toward an imagined
effort which is long since gone, which is holding that
force there. And there is apathy on this channel. There's
also grief. There's also any other emotion.

Now, you should know this, because you will see a preclear
go into various emotional tones and drop and rise on
Communication Processing. And Communication Processing is a
good process; Effort Processing is a poor process. If you
didn't have anything else, it'd be real good, but it's a
real poor process, really. But the liability of Effort
Processing still shows up in Communication Processing in
that the individual in resisting - Now, by the way, there
could be - same thing, you know. He could be - been preventing
somebody from going away from him, and you start to have
communication occur and communication occur in that area,
and communication occur and this thing starts going away
from him and gets further and further - some kind of a mass
or a ridge, you see - and all of a sudden he starts to feel
very apathetic, and so on. Run it just a little bit longer
and he will let go of it. What happens there? As it gets
further away his effort to keep it from going away is seen
to be failing and this failure results in the manifestation
we call apathy.

So incoming or outgoing, any force is liable to wind an
individual up in apathy as the interim or midpoint of the
communication process. You follow me? It'll be the midpoint.

Now, as he goes into effort, you'd better run it just as
long the other way. See, I mean, you just do the same
process, but if he goes into apathy - . First, he'll go into
effort and so forth, you'd better run it long enough to let
him hit a little apathy or something of the sort. If he's
got big ridges or forces moving around, he'll sure go into
apathy. And then you'd better run it a little bit further.

Well, you know what really happens? It runs out of the
effort band into the emotional band and where the effort
finally ceases to be effort and becomes emotion, the
emotion is apathy. So he's just starting up tone. You got
that? So you'd run it long enough to get him on up tone.
He'll come up tone. Well, you should know that about effort.

The thought-emotion-effort, the
know-look-emote-effort-think-symbols-eat-sex-mystery, that
band right there is the full band. Thought-emotion-effort
was an earlier version of it. And when you started to work
out effort in any direction at all, why, you'd move up
usually into the emotional band, and this was painful or it
was upsetting to the preclear in some fashion, and so an
auditor is likely to quit right about that time. Well,
he's just winning, he's just beginning to win. The apathy
is above the solid mass which the individual was a moment
before. And actually, he feels better, although he's
apathetic. He couldn't feel at all just before, you see. So
of course he feels better.

All right. So the earliest band of this, by the way, the
earliest one was the emotional band as demonstrated in Book
One. By the way, have you ever done - have you ever
recognized that Science of Survival's Chart of Human
Evaluation is an expansion of the Chart of Survival, which
is the first chart in Book One?

Male voice: Yup.

The earliest form of the Chart of Human Evaluation is that
Book One chart.

By the way, in investigation, I decided a long time ago
that if I couldn't represent something in a two-dimensional
graph, it probably wasn't true or it had some missing
factors in it. That's a fascinating regimen that many a
philosopher should've watched. If he couldn't express
something on a two-dimensional graph, why, he had something
missing someplace. It's just sort of an arbitrary thing but
it happens to work out to be true. You'd say, "Well, heck,
you've left space out of it." You should be able to express
space on a two-dimensional graph.

Now, emotion is a connector between thought and effort,
manifestation of beingness, so forth. One handles motion on
a direct ratio with his ability to handle emotion and the
higher his emotion level, the more control he can exert
over motion; the lower his emotion level, the more he
succumbs to motion.

What is emotion? Emotion is the first solid manifestation
of looking. One runs from looking into emotion. Emotion is
the first solid manifestation of this.

I'm not going to talk to you all this hour about these
axioms; I have something else to talk to you about.

Energy is postulated particles in space.

An engram - oh, please, please know what an engram is. An
engram is a - its most rudimentary definition which'd be a
quite correct one, it's a moment of pain and
unconsciousness. And we'd have to go on and say: contained
in a facsimile form. You wouldn't have to contain all
perceptics to be an engram. You could have a half-erased
engram and it'd still be sitting there as an engram. You'll
still find them. You'll still run into them.

Exteriorization is the act of moving the thetan outside of
the body.

Facsimile is a recording in energy of an incident or part
of an incident, in the physical universe, that should be.
It's a theta recording in the physical universe, but it's
really made out of energy. I mean, it has mass. It has
mass. It has position.

There's an interesting anatomy of facsimiles, by the way.
Facsimiles are double. There is the facsimile that happened
then and the facsimile made by remembering the facsimile
then. And a person's facsimiles which he's got close up to
him are the second facsimile. See, the original facsimile
is lying back at the place where it happened. He keeps his
facsimiles located in locations, so that if he ever
approaches that location again, the facsimile will
restimulate him and scare him so that he won't have to
think about the thing.

Male voice: There's your jack rabbits.

Jack rabbits.

All right. The genetic entity, that's what we call a GE. We
were just talking about the spirit of man and the spirit of
woman. Black Hackton - you're in Arizona now so I'll tell you
how the GE came into being - Black Hackton built it. After he
built the sky and the Earth, why, Black Hackton made birds
and fish and animals, and there was nobody to appreciate
them, so he created man. And he made him out of clay and so
forth. And that's who did it: Black Hackton. That's the
Apache legend of the creation of man. So, you want to know
that. That's his proper name.

I asked a young Apache the other day if he'd run into Black
Hackton lately, and he didn't know who I was talking about.
Isn't that curious? I mean, his tribal lore is probably
better known today to white men than to Apaches.

But Black Hackton was quite a boy, quite a boy. Sort of
looked to me like an invader from space mock-up, myself. I
always kind of thought this was probably what it was,
because no thetan covered completely with blackness would
do much mocking up. But anyway, that's who made the world:
Black Hackton. And he made all these GEs.

The GE, actually, is an evolved piece of machinery. Many
life forms of one kind or another get trapped and they
undergo a mutual sort of an agreement and their planning
is all based on two postulates. You want to know what those
postulates are? Yeah, you can just take a GE to pieces with
these two postulates. There are three, if you really want
to take them to pieces.

The first one is convince, an effort to convince somebody.
Convince. And when he can't convince him by thought, he
drops into emotion, and when he can't convince him by
emotion, he drops into effort, and when he can't convince
him by effort, why, he thinks about it. And then probably
talks about it, the plaintive sort of thing, "What they did
to me," that you say you occasionally hear from preclears.

And then he'll drop into eating it. You know, to solace
himself about the whole thing, he goes into an inversion
and he starts to eat. And if he can't eat well, he'll go
into sex. Demonstration of that later fact, by the way, is
actually - it's actually demonstrable. You can take a rat,
family of rats, and starve them, and they'll begin to breed
like mad. Although there's less food for the future, they
will breed faster. And if you feed them well, why, they
will not breed.

So that the cattle here in the fed areas in Arizona and in
the West have recently dropped in their birth rate to an
alarming degree, and stockmen are very, very upset about
this. They don't know what to do about it. Well, we could
tell them. All they'd have to do is take a certain part of
their breeding stock and just cut hell out of their
rations, and they'd get cattle.

Male voice: Starve them periodically.

Hmm?

Male voice: Starve them periodically?

Well, just take certain breeding stock, and then you'd have
your - the stock that you're feeding to market, and take
breeding stock and don't feed that breeding stock, don't
feed them well at all, and you'll get lots of young calves.

Male voice: I want the second postulate.

Oh, you want - you still want that second postulate. Well,
the first one is convinced and the next one is constancy.
Just the idea of constancy, of loyalty, of constancy, of
sticking with it, sticking to it on and on. You know, you
can practically kill somebody just by running "I must be
constant," or match terminaling constancy, the idea, or
any one of these things. It just tears the GE right to pieces.

Male voice: (unclear)

Well, I was going to talk to you about this a little bit
later: must acknowledge. If you were to deny an
acknowledgment or communication, that would be the end of that.

Now, the genetic entity got there evidently by trying to
convince people and showing them what had happened in
massed form when they couldn't show him in - with ideas. And
they keep holding up this mass, these masses, and so forth.
Anybody who's holding up masses has been inhibited from
convincing somebody with ideas, so if he can't convince
people with ideas, he starts convincing people with masses.

If you want to know how birth gets into restimulation,
well, this is a GE under way of manufacture. Little boy
comes up to his mama and tells him [her] he remembers
birth, and Mama says, "Oh, no, nonsense." He'll show it to
her, get the idea? And he'll actually wear it from there
on, waiting for her to say, "Yes, Johnny, you really do
remember birth."

Male voice: Something Vonne just said, invention.

What's that?

Male voice: The guy that couldn't convince somebody that
his idea worked, built it.

Oh, yes. Yeah, the built invention. Of course, he goes on
the lower harmonic of that and merely invents and doesn't
even tell - or he may just start talking, and then after a
while he won't even talk to anybody about his invention.
Masses come about invariably through a failure to convince,
and when they start failing to convince people, they go
down in masses.

A very, very important factor in Scientology, you try to
tell people about engrams, you try to tell them about
aberration, and you eventually get to the point where you
have to wear it, because they won't listen to you.

The Grand Tour is of course just one of the R1 processes,
"Be here. Be there," having to do with this particular galaxy.

Havingness is defined here as mass occupying the same space
as the preclear. That's quite a trick. If it actually
occupied the exact same space as the preclear, it would
disappear. So it would merely be mass possessed by the 
pre clear or others. That'd be a very understanding definition
of it.

You understand that if you ask a preclear to bring in
havingness, it disappears, if he brings it all the way in.
It'll only remain there if he brings it only partly in. So
to have anything, an individual can't possibly finish the
action of bringing it in.

I, the thetan, the center of awareness, that part of the
total organism that is fundamentally cause. A thetan has
quality, not quantity. Lot of other things you could say
about the thetan.

Center of awareness is the aware of being aware unit.

Invalidation: a statement, action or inference that makes
the preclear appear wrong. In version: a switch to the
opposite obsessive consideration as from compulsion to
inhibition. Now, here you have a dichotomy at work. An
individusl says long enough, "I can work; I can work; I can
work; I can work." Now, given this factor that he's trying
to convince somebody he can work, the next thing you know
he can't work. Now, it would just be - that's the most
elementary definition of an inversion, would be to slip to
the other side of the dichotomy.

Do you know that an individual could obsessively flow -
this depends upon convincing people, obsession flow, stuck
flows, for this to happen at all? But an individual goes
down the Know to Sex Scale and then inverts. He actually
can run the dynamics and invert on the dynamics. Instead of
an urge towards survive, he gets an urge toward succumb on
each one of the dynamics. That's an immediate inversion of
each one of the dynamics. You can take any pre clear and
see where he is in the process of inverting.

Now, there's another type of inversion which is not
inversion, but which is assumption of the valence. One
abandons his own identity and takes on another identity.
And this goes hand in glove with inversion.

A thetan runs into a trap and becomes the trap. And if you
run him as a trap for a little while, he'll all of a sudden
say, "You know, there's a thetan in here someplace?" And
then the damnedest, horriblest apathy will turn on as he
suddenly discovers that he's it. Now, there is an inversion
of identity.

So an inversion means a switch to the opposite side of the
dichotomy or object. Key-in is the incident that first
brings about restimulation of an engram. Oh, brother. We
could go into that endlessly. That's a big subject, key-in,
best covered in Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental
Health. It is an analytical level occurrence which keys in
an engram. That's the proper definition.

Life continuum: one individual attempting to carry on the
life of another deceased individual or departed
individual - another deceased or departed individual - by 
means of generating in his own body the infirmities and
mannerisms of the deceased or departed individual. It's
trying to carry on the life of another who is deceased or
departed. And a person doesn't have to be deceased for you
to carry on a life continuum for him.

It's quite obsessive, by the way; it isn't volitional. A
life continuum is not volitional. The individual misses the
other person to such a degree that he keeps the other
person around by being him, only he doesn't have a
cognizance of this.

Why doesn't he have cognizance of this? It's because he's
manifesting it in mass, manifesting it in a mass form by
tokens or spaces or desires for masses, and so forth. And
this is all mass. Life continuum is a mass problem. You got
that, now? Problem in masses. That is the only time that
you would be worried or think twice in a preclear about a
life continuum, it would be a problem in masses.

Male voice: Wouldn't a life continuum just be sort of a
solid form of a valence shift?

Well, that's the manifestation that we're interested in
here when we say life continuum. He's taken on some of the
shape or some of the objects or some of the mannerisms,
actions of this other individual. And he just - he's just
got - still got that other individual here, you see? Very
often he'd have a mock-up of Mama standing out here two
feet from him.

Yes?

Female voice: It doesn't have to be human either does it?

No, no. You can run a life continuum on a locomotive.

All right. Now, anything which goes into mass form is out
of thought form, isn't it. Huh? It's out of thought form.
The first thing you should know about masses is a mass is a
thought so solid that one is not thinking about it. Got
that? It's a memory. A mass is a solid memory.

But one doesn't think about a solid memory, but when it
starts to come apart, one starts to think. You got the
idea? It's just starting to come up scale, and of course it
just goes up the mystery, on up toward know, you see. And
it'll come up to think, and he'll figure-figure-figure
before he really hits the more solid portion of it.

By the way, your preclear starts... 
figure-figure-figure-figure-figure-figure-figure, you watch
out; he's got a mass, he's going to have a mass in just a
moment. He's giving birth. Just a little bit up scale from
there. Line charge is a prolonged spell of uncontrolled
laughter, crying, which may be continued for several hours.
You certainly know what line charges are.

A lock: an apparently minor incident which assumes an
unreasonable importance due to its containing some
similarity to and restimulating an earlier engram or engram
chain. You can have a chain of engrams, several - the fellow
can be PDHed by a dentist or something, several ways,
several times, and then eventually this gets keyed in, and
then you can have sitting on top of that a number of locks.
Well, a lock is just a repetition of a key-in. You know all
about that.

Matter is grouped particles of energy located in a
relatively stable relationship to each other.

MEST: the initial letters of matter, energy, space and
time, meaning physical universe.

Mind is the machines, circuits, facsimiles, memories and so
forth which are used in the individual's thinking process,
plus the thetan. I'm afraid that nothing exists in the
absence of life. Life gone, there isn't anything. You could
have a pretty solid life form, but it'd still be alive. A
mind has to be alive to be considered a mind. You can't
have an electronic brain be a mind, not by our
understanding of it. It can be a thinking machine. The mind
is not a part of the thetan; it's not necessary for the
higher level activities of a thetan.

It's perfectly true, here we're talking about mind, but
remember, for a mind to be alive or functioning, it's got
to have some life in it somewhere.

A mock-up is a full perceptic energy picture in three
dimensions created by the thetan and having location in
space and time. Now, that's the ideal definition. A mock-up
is something that the thetan puts up and says is there.
That's what a mock-up is, something the thetan puts up and
says is there.

A motivator is an overt act by another determinism against
the preclear. There should be, right under that, motivator
hunger. An individual who's done so many overt acts, he's
got a nice stuck flow, but he starts - he inverts on it and
he begins to crave things being done to him. If you don't
recognize that with your preclears, you're going to have a
lot of trouble with some preclear sooner or later.

He is just - he just - oh, man! What he would - why, what he
would pay you if you just hit him in the jaw. And here you
are processing motivators out of him, and he'll just get
more and more hungry, more and more hungry, more and more
hungry, more and more hungry. This guy's been a beast and
he hasn't any reverse flow to compensate for this. And so
you get motivator hunger, and it really should be right there.

There's also overt hunger. Individual's been done to and
done to and done to until he know longer cares who he
shoots. You've got a criminal. See, he'll just do anything
completely irresponsibly. Enough has been done to him - .
Here's an example. Somebody walks up to you and hits you
over the head with a club and while you're down, gouges out
one eye and kicks all your teeth in and so forth. And
you're not fond of this at all. So if he did this with
malice aforethought and it was a felony and so on, you now
feel that you have the right to gun him down, one way or
the other. You now have the right to wreck him. Well, that
in itself is overt act hunger. This is quite a remarkable
thing, this overt act-motivator sequence, and motivator
hunger and overt act hunger. Generals, of course, who have
been taught to go into war and taught to war and taught to
war and all the things that happen to them in the form of
red tape and punishments and reprimands and so forth, and
boy, they get so damn overt act hungry, they'll send out
battalions just to get slaughtered. You know, men pound at
them and hammer at them and give them a bad time, and
they'll finally turn around and start to butcher everybody
in sight.

It's quite remarkable. You'll see this thing working out in
the behavior patterns of life. What it is, is a flow
getting stuck in one direction and then it gets so stuck
that it can't stick any further, and it starts to cave in
on the individual. It becomes obsessive. Curious business,
motivators.

Necessity level is degree of emergency in present time
environment. It would be that amount of commotion necessary
to extrovert the individual into action in present time.
That would be necessity level. That amount of urgency or
commotion necessary in the environment to extrovert the
individual and put him into motion in present time.

Two hundred and ten miles an hour in a car would bring
almost anybody into present time, even a psycho. Lots of
people come into present time and extrovert on an emergency
level of sixty miles an hour. See, the danger in the
environment is getting more and more apparent, more and
more apparent, and it'll finally extrovert them. It'll take
their attention right off their bank.

By the way, this is operational shock. We'll sometimes
operate on somebody and have him key out all the way on
down the board. When an operation's successful, this has
happened so we wonder why anybody would operate on anybody.
We can produce emergency present time environment shocks
much more easily than putting somebody under anesthetic.
It'd be a silly way to go about it, give him another engram.

You probably could make somebody key out. I know I have
seen a couple of instances of this. I saw a sailor one time
utterly change his personality, just completely change his
personality. He was never the same man afterwards. He was
a much better boy. But he had hit a sufficient amount of
emergency to extrovert him, and he continued to be
extroverted over such a period of time that his attention
had come off of practically everything on which it was
fixed in his bank, and he was a happy-go-lucky, cheerful
fellow afterwards, and up to that time he'd been the most
grumbling, growly fellow you ever saw.

A crew, by the way, has to - it's an old saw - that a naval
crew has to go through an action before it starts to work
as a ship. In other words, they have to have enough present
time emergency or urgency to get their attention off
themselves and onto the environment.

A notable example of this: a medical doctor, it was
reported - in Italy, one of the US hospitals in Italy during
World War I - to have cured a what they called in that war
shell shock, combat fatigue and later, exhaustion, in the
last war. He cured this fellow simply by walking in and
saying, "Well, we've got to evacuate the hospital. There's
no sense in trying to take this fellow along." The fellow
was lying there completely paralyzed and "No sense in
taking him along. It would be cruelty to leave him to fall
into the hands of the enemy," and pulled out his gun,
cocked it, and the paralytic jumped up from the bed and
says, "My God, don't shoot. I'm all right; I'll go." And
the action is not that this guy was faking; it was just
that his attention was suddenly yanked off of all this
beautiful trauma he was holding onto, was extroverted, and
of course he could operate after that.

You, in auditing, are simply trying to extrovert the
person's attention from these hidden terminals inside the
bank, and necessity level will very often play a prominent
part in an auditor's repertoire, without his knowing
anything about it, or sometimes his knowing something about
it but without noticing it.

Fellow turns up to be audited because his wife is going to
leave him if he doesn't get audited, that's an example of
it. Emergency or urgency in the environment turns him
around and he's asking you to extrovert him.

Nothingness: this is one of the more interesting words and
one of the more interesting discoveries of Scientology, was
the definition of nothing. Nothing, up to the time of
Scientology, was considered a nothing of something, and
nobody had a absolute nothingness. The mathematician was
using then a wild variable in his formulas and in
Scientology we have nothingness meaning an absence of
everything: no time, no space, no energy, no thought.

Now, it wouldn't necessarily mean an absence of life,
because life is a quality, not a quantity. So nothingness
specifically means an absence of quantities and locations.
The proper definition for nothingness in Scientology is an
absence of quantities and locations. A complete absence of
quantities and locations would be an absolute nothingness.

Occlusion. I don't think we have to go over that word. I
think that you've run into an occluded case. I don't think
there's any confusion at all in your minds as to what an
occlusion is. Actually, it means a curtain, something cut
out from.

Organism: physical manifestation of life in material form,
organized and controlled by theta.

Orientation point, and there we get into a much longer
dissertation than I care to go on with you today. Our
definitions, as I say, have more rationale behind them than
words. Actually, when you really know a definition you have
a certain cognition of a state of existence. And when you
recognize that state of existence you've got the definition.

By the way, when you actually recognize that state of
existence, you could sure state it on a piece of paper.
That's right. It isn't really a matter of stating just the
right words called for by the examination. It's a matter of
stating that state of existence. And you can state it very
economically if you really know it.

Just like I always shy away from 18-page, both sides,
written letters which come to me "emergency, special
delivery, personal, registered." I know that this letter is
not going to have a point. Something just tells me that
this is going to be the case. It's unsolicited and you
haven't asked anybody for a report and all of a sudden this
terrifically long, cramped missive shows up, you know about
what this is going to be about. Anybody knows what he's
talking about, why, generally everything he's got to say to
you would go on a couple of pages rather easily; he would
say it. And if he had a report to render on something, it
would be in a report form. You know, he'd report to you
about something. Or if he were really reporting to you in a
letter, he would simply go on and report to you about it.
And then he'd probably send it to you by some reasonable
method of transmission. And furthermore, he wouldn't
distrust that it arrives.

England, every once in a while, goes through a convulsion
of knowing its communications aren't arriving. Well, they
aren't arriving in the no-time which they have assigned to
them. It takes them three or four days to get over here
and get answered, and four or five more days to get
answered, you know, and back again. And they will take ten
days, then, is their answer span. That's a predictable lag.
They don't predict that lag; they think that they ought to
get an answer the next morning, so they write another
despatch and another despatch and another despatch, and by
the time they've written several, they've clarified the
situation themselves, so an answer's extraneous. But you
answer the first despatch and that now creates confusion.
So you answer the second despatch and tbat's more confusion
and ... You get what's happening to this communication line?
It's tumbling.

So if a person has to go on and on and on, actually, to
define something that is in Scientology, I'd say anything
here is definable, or actually not just definable, but is
describable within the framework of a thousand words. I
mean, it's fully describably within a framework of a
thousand words. It could be described in a skeletal fashion
in about two hundred and fifty words, usually. And it
could be defined in a very few words, if you really
understood what it was, and you were merely showing
somebody you did know what it was.

I'm clamping down a bit on these memorized definitions,
particularly since in reading this material, I've had to
give you time after time a better or more precise
definition of the word than is contained in this glossary.
This glossary needs badly to be rewritten, and I will get
it rewritten off of that tape. 

Okay.

(end of lecture)





